  
		 | 
		
			
			  
	
		There are many cumbersome ways to kill a man: 
		you can make him carry a plank of wood 
		to the top of a hill and nail him to it. To do this 
		properly you require a crowd of people 
		wearing sandals, a cock that crows, a cloak 
		to dissect, a sponge, some vinegar and one 
		man to hammer the nails home.
  
		Or you can take a length of steel, 
		shaped and chased in a traditional way, 
		and attempt to pierce the metal cage he wears. 
		But for this you need white horses, 
		English trees, men with bows and arrows, 
		at least two flags, a prince and a 
		castle to hold your banquet in.
  
		Dispensing with nobility, you may, if the wind 
		allows, blow gas at him. But then you need 
		a mile of mud sliced through with ditches, 
		not to mention black boots, bomb craters, 
		more mud, a plague of rats, a dozen songs 
		and some round hats made of steel.
  
		In an age of aeroplanes, you may fly 
		miles above your victim and dispose of him by 
		pressing one small switch. All you then 
		require is an ocean to separate you, two 
		systems of government, a nation's scientists, 
		several factories, a psychopath and 
		land that no one needs for several years.
  
		There are, as I began, cumbersome ways 
		to kill a man. Simpler, direct, and much more neat 
		is to see that he is living somewhere in the middle 
		of the twentieth century, and leave him there.
  
		Possible assignments: 
		1. Which historical events does the speaker talk about? Descibe and comment on them in your own words, 
		2. Even if man were not threatened by violence and wars, what other dangers would he have to face in the future?
		
  
		
	
		 |